<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On The Shelves: 11/23/05</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loudpoet.com/2005/11/22/on-the-shelves-112305/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loudpoet.com/2005/11/22/on-the-shelves-112305/</link>
	<description>On Publishing, Poetry, Politics and Pop Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ichiban Sensei</title>
		<link>http://loudpoet.com/2005/11/22/on-the-shelves-112305/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>Ichiban Sensei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 06:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loudpoet.com/archives/953#comment-792</guid>
		<description>Nice blog you have here.  Not knowing what Paradox #1 was, I picked it up on release day. . . I posted a review on &lt;a HREF="http://ichibancomics.blogspot.com" REL="nofollow"&gt;my blog&lt;/a&gt;, which gives more detail, but I didn't really enjoy it.  The concept is that there's a detective in a parallel world (to the earth) where everything is run by magic.  So science and the rules of science as we understand them are out the window.  Anyway, someone commits a crime with a gun, and people are dumb-founded. . . there aren't guns on this parallel universe.  Anyway, the concept was neat enough, but the story was a little convoluted for my taste...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Keep up the sweet site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice blog you have here.  Not knowing what Paradox #1 was, I picked it up on release day. . . I posted a review on <a HREF="http://ichibancomics.blogspot.com" REL="nofollow">my blog</a>, which gives more detail, but I didn&#8217;t really enjoy it.  The concept is that there&#8217;s a detective in a parallel world (to the earth) where everything is run by magic.  So science and the rules of science as we understand them are out the window.  Anyway, someone commits a crime with a gun, and people are dumb-founded. . . there aren&#8217;t guns on this parallel universe.  Anyway, the concept was neat enough, but the story was a little convoluted for my taste&#8230;</p>
<p>Keep up the sweet site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://loudpoet.com/2005/11/22/on-the-shelves-112305/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loudpoet.com/archives/953#comment-771</guid>
		<description>Loveless #1 was one of the most awkward comics I've read in some time, glad to see someone agrees. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It seems like they’re trying to do the more modern western we're all falling in love with like Deadwood where every character has a shady side. The thing is, there are definitive heroes – people that we are supposed to root for – and the bad guys are equally endearing. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;With Loveless it’s like he took all the bad and left none of the heart. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A great example is the use of the black soldiers in Loveless compared to the Chinese in Deadwood. In Deadwood we hear “chink” “chinamen” “yellow” – everyone (except Swearengen, our supposed villain), doesn’t care at all for these guys, they’re less than dirt. Bu they’re portrayed in a way that makes us love them – I love Mr. Wu and I felt for the prostitutes in the second season. Same goes for Hostetler and General – the town hates them, tarred and feathered one of them – but when we focus on them they’re endearing, we love them – great characters.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;With Loveless, everyone’s saying “nigger this” and “nigger that” and then we actually see black people and they’re bloodthirsty savages.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It’s just…ew. Awkward. I felt so awkward reading it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loveless #1 was one of the most awkward comics I&#8217;ve read in some time, glad to see someone agrees. </p>
<p>It seems like they’re trying to do the more modern western we&#8217;re all falling in love with like Deadwood where every character has a shady side. The thing is, there are definitive heroes – people that we are supposed to root for – and the bad guys are equally endearing. </p>
<p>With Loveless it’s like he took all the bad and left none of the heart. </p>
<p>A great example is the use of the black soldiers in Loveless compared to the Chinese in Deadwood. In Deadwood we hear “chink” “chinamen” “yellow” – everyone (except Swearengen, our supposed villain), doesn’t care at all for these guys, they’re less than dirt. Bu they’re portrayed in a way that makes us love them – I love Mr. Wu and I felt for the prostitutes in the second season. Same goes for Hostetler and General – the town hates them, tarred and feathered one of them – but when we focus on them they’re endearing, we love them – great characters.</p>
<p>With Loveless, everyone’s saying “nigger this” and “nigger that” and then we actually see black people and they’re bloodthirsty savages.</p>
<p>It’s just…ew. Awkward. I felt so awkward reading it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
