<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: COMMENT: Who Cares About Journalism?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loudpoet.com/2005/12/16/comment-who-cares-about-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loudpoet.com/2005/12/16/comment-who-cares-about-journalism/</link>
	<description>loudpoet.com: Blogging it like it is since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:59:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guy LeCharles Gonzalez: loudpoet / How the Internet (and Advertisers) Killed Journalism</title>
		<link>http://loudpoet.com/2005/12/16/comment-who-cares-about-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-2128</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy LeCharles Gonzalez: loudpoet / How the Internet (and Advertisers) Killed Journalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loudpoet.com/archives/973#comment-2128</guid>
		<description>[...] excellent blogs), but it&#8217;s not a non-profit company, and as I noted a few years back in reference to the comic book industry, and as Warren concludes his piece, I don&#8217;t know if there are &#8220;enough people out there [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] excellent blogs), but it&#8217;s not a non-profit company, and as I noted a few years back in reference to the comic book industry, and as Warren concludes his piece, I don&#8217;t know if there are &#8220;enough people out there [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zilla</title>
		<link>http://loudpoet.com/2005/12/16/comment-who-cares-about-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>zilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loudpoet.com/archives/973#comment-830</guid>
		<description>&quot;I had a reign of terror once. Okay, it was more like a rain of terror. Alright, alright, it rained on my terrier. Same difference really.&quot;  i love this quote :)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ps - guy def give yourself some credit - the mindless crap i post over at zilla&#039;s is embarassing next to some (read: most) of your comic universe writings ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I had a reign of terror once. Okay, it was more like a rain of terror. Alright, alright, it rained on my terrier. Same difference really.&#8221;  i love this quote <img src='http://loudpoet.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>ps &#8211; guy def give yourself some credit &#8211; the mindless crap i post over at zilla&#8217;s is embarassing next to some (read: most) of your comic universe writings <img src='http://loudpoet.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://loudpoet.com/2005/12/16/comment-who-cares-about-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 04:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loudpoet.com/archives/973#comment-829</guid>
		<description>Wait - I&#039;m not getting paid?  I wondered where the checks were.  I may have to rethink my commitment ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait &#8211; I&#8217;m not getting paid?  I wondered where the checks were.  I may have to rethink my commitment &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy LeCharles Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://loudpoet.com/2005/12/16/comment-who-cares-about-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy LeCharles Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 03:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loudpoet.com/archives/973#comment-828</guid>
		<description>&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.lofimagazine.com/&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lofimagazine.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Newish comics-oriented mag, kinda wants to be &lt;i&gt;Wizard&lt;/i&gt; for the indie/urban market, just relaunched as a &quot;monthly&quot; a couple of months ago. Run by some Latinos out of Miami - which is the embarassing part - and I&#039;m pretty sure Devil&#039;s Due and/or Josh Blaylock have a hand in it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It&#039;s got a very similar content breakdown to PopCultureShock, with comics, games, music, etc, and a lot of potential that so far has been wasted amidst a horribly dated design (ie: &lt;i&gt;Wired&lt;/i&gt; at its excessive 90s worst), fluff interviews, reviews and PR, and an incredible amount of typos. And that&#039;s just the comics coverage. I couldn&#039;t bring myself to read the other stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a HREF="http://www.lofimagazine.com/" REL="nofollow">lofimagazine.com</a></p>
<p>Newish comics-oriented mag, kinda wants to be <i>Wizard</i> for the indie/urban market, just relaunched as a &#8220;monthly&#8221; a couple of months ago. Run by some Latinos out of Miami &#8211; which is the embarassing part &#8211; and I&#8217;m pretty sure Devil&#8217;s Due and/or Josh Blaylock have a hand in it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s got a very similar content breakdown to PopCultureShock, with comics, games, music, etc, and a lot of potential that so far has been wasted amidst a horribly dated design (ie: <i>Wired</i> at its excessive 90s worst), fluff interviews, reviews and PR, and an incredible amount of typos. And that&#8217;s just the comics coverage. I couldn&#8217;t bring myself to read the other stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erech</title>
		<link>http://loudpoet.com/2005/12/16/comment-who-cares-about-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>Erech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 03:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loudpoet.com/archives/973#comment-827</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never heard of this Lo-fi before today, and then suddenly I see it all over. What&#039;s so bad about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never heard of this Lo-fi before today, and then suddenly I see it all over. What&#8217;s so bad about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy LeCharles Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://loudpoet.com/2005/12/16/comment-who-cares-about-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy LeCharles Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 02:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loudpoet.com/archives/973#comment-826</guid>
		<description>Actually, Mark said that last bit. Credit where due!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Mark said that last bit. Credit where due!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy LeCharles Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://loudpoet.com/2005/12/16/comment-who-cares-about-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy LeCharles Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loudpoet.com/archives/973#comment-825</guid>
		<description>And now, the less serious replies:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Erech said: &lt;i&gt;You should totally follow this up with &quot;10 reasons Mary Jane is the hottest chick in comics&quot; though, throw everyone off ;)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My name&#039;s not JD.  :-O&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Kurt said: &lt;i&gt;Though you&#039;d probably never, ever get a nod from Ellis again.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m thinking one nod in a lifetime is enough, lest I risk following Brady and Wieland down the road more traveled! I am aiming for one &lt;i&gt;Scott Pilgrim&lt;/i&gt;-type plug in a [Bad Signal] in the next 12 months, though.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Kurt said: &lt;i&gt;I wish I could have a reign of terror. That&#039;s an achievement.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Dude, I&#039;ve reigned terribly before and it&#039;s not all it&#039;s cracked up to be! Right, Stephen? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now, the less serious replies:</p>
<p><b>Erech said: <i>You should totally follow this up with &#8220;10 reasons Mary Jane is the hottest chick in comics&#8221; though, throw everyone off <img src='http://loudpoet.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </i></b></p>
<p>My name&#8217;s not JD.  :-O</p>
<p><b>Kurt said: <i>Though you&#8217;d probably never, ever get a nod from Ellis again.</i></b></p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking one nod in a lifetime is enough, lest I risk following Brady and Wieland down the road more traveled! I am aiming for one <i>Scott Pilgrim</i>-type plug in a [Bad Signal] in the next 12 months, though.</p>
<p><b>Kurt said: <i>I wish I could have a reign of terror. That&#8217;s an achievement.</i></b></p>
<p>Dude, I&#8217;ve reigned terribly before and it&#8217;s not all it&#8217;s cracked up to be! Right, Stephen? <img src='http://loudpoet.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy LeCharles Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://loudpoet.com/2005/12/16/comment-who-cares-about-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy LeCharles Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 02:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loudpoet.com/archives/973#comment-824</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Kurt said: &lt;i&gt;...journalism doesn’t just take work it takes someone with a nose, as they say, for the story and it takes a story.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Donelson said: &lt;i&gt;...the fact that it requires analysis and legwork is exactly why it doesn&#039;t happen.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Very true, both of you. Which is what particularly frustrates me about NEWSarama and CBR, both of whom have their noses so far up---ah, I mean, have all the connections necessary to do real news and yet choose to focus on fluff and co-operative PR for the Big Two. While I believe I have the nose for journalism, and *cue theme music* the passion to use it for good, I don&#039;t have the time do it the way I&#039;d like to. Which frustrates me to no end, especially when something like &lt;i&gt;Lo-Fi&lt;/i&gt; comes on the scene and makes me embarassed in ways &lt;i&gt;Wizard&lt;/i&gt; never has.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And yes, Kurt, I DO owe you an email. I&#039;ll rectify that this weekend.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Erech said: &lt;i&gt;...or spend a couple days during a month pulling together stuff like this.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Stephen said: &lt;i&gt;If you didn&#039;t have fun writing it you wouldn&#039;t have done it. You would have reviewed X-Factor #1 (which was refreshing).&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Actually, that&#039;s what I&#039;m thinking I want to do once things smooth out over at PopCultureShock after the relaunch and all of our contributors are in place and reasonably on schedule. I like doing the reviews, but it&#039;s been a bitch to keep the weekly roundups flush since I stopped writing as many as I used to. The new format, with the shorter reviews, will help once it settles in, and I&#039;m hoping to appoint eventually appoint a Reviews Editor to get that responsibility off my plate.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Writing the Speakeasy piece was a lot osfun, particularly because the puzzle-like nature of it appealed to what Salomé, my wife, has started referring to as my autistic tendencies. Articles like that, I believe, are what will keep me from burning out too soon. They&#039;re also more likely to move me closer to my master plan...  Heh heh heh!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As for &lt;i&gt;X-Factor&lt;/i&gt; #1, I&#039;m actually planning to review it this week since I thoroughly enjoyed it! Gonna try to work in a &lt;i&gt;Madrox&lt;/i&gt; TPB review, too, which I highly recommend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Kurt said: <i>&#8230;journalism doesn’t just take work it takes someone with a nose, as they say, for the story and it takes a story.</i></b></p>
<p><b>Donelson said: <i>&#8230;the fact that it requires analysis and legwork is exactly why it doesn&#8217;t happen.</i></b></p>
<p>Very true, both of you. Which is what particularly frustrates me about NEWSarama and CBR, both of whom have their noses so far up&#8212;ah, I mean, have all the connections necessary to do real news and yet choose to focus on fluff and co-operative PR for the Big Two. While I believe I have the nose for journalism, and *cue theme music* the passion to use it for good, I don&#8217;t have the time do it the way I&#8217;d like to. Which frustrates me to no end, especially when something like <i>Lo-Fi</i> comes on the scene and makes me embarassed in ways <i>Wizard</i> never has.</p>
<p>And yes, Kurt, I DO owe you an email. I&#8217;ll rectify that this weekend.</p>
<p><b>Erech said: <i>&#8230;or spend a couple days during a month pulling together stuff like this.</i></b></p>
<p><b>Stephen said: <i>If you didn&#8217;t have fun writing it you wouldn&#8217;t have done it. You would have reviewed X-Factor #1 (which was refreshing).</i></b></p>
<p>Actually, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m thinking I want to do once things smooth out over at PopCultureShock after the relaunch and all of our contributors are in place and reasonably on schedule. I like doing the reviews, but it&#8217;s been a bitch to keep the weekly roundups flush since I stopped writing as many as I used to. The new format, with the shorter reviews, will help once it settles in, and I&#8217;m hoping to appoint eventually appoint a Reviews Editor to get that responsibility off my plate.</p>
<p>Writing the Speakeasy piece was a lot osfun, particularly because the puzzle-like nature of it appealed to what Salomé, my wife, has started referring to as my autistic tendencies. Articles like that, I believe, are what will keep me from burning out too soon. They&#8217;re also more likely to move me closer to my master plan&#8230;  Heh heh heh!</p>
<p>As for <i>X-Factor</i> #1, I&#8217;m actually planning to review it this week since I thoroughly enjoyed it! Gonna try to work in a <i>Madrox</i> TPB review, too, which I highly recommend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMASHER</title>
		<link>http://loudpoet.com/2005/12/16/comment-who-cares-about-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>SMASHER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loudpoet.com/archives/973#comment-823</guid>
		<description>Nice work on the Speakeasy piece.  I&#039;ve never picked up a Speakeasy comic nor a comic from any of the creators interviewed in the article but I found the story compelling and the &#039;facts&#039; eye-opening.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I then read your colleague&#039;s column from November about &lt;a&gt;John Byrne&#039;s netiquette&lt;/a&gt;.  While your article has more journalistic integrity, I found her story to be equally compelling.  The Byrne piece could be the crown jewel in a future article about the rampant fanaticism &amp; hero worship in this industry.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Point is there&#039;s a time and place for 4,200 word feasts.  We don&#039;t need it every week.  But I think the comic audience &lt;i&gt;craves&lt;/i&gt; journalism.  The comic book fan is a reader, a critic, a collector, an artist or an art appreciator.  All of those things, to me, describe a person who has the capacity for analysis and who actively analyizes  the world and his surroundings (when he&#039;s not daydreaming about how hot Mary Jane is, of course).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Keep writing articles like the Speakeasy one.  Besides you liked it.  If you didn&#039;t have fun writing it you wouldn&#039;t have done it.  You would have reviewed X-Factor #1 (which was refreshing).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work on the Speakeasy piece.  I&#8217;ve never picked up a Speakeasy comic nor a comic from any of the creators interviewed in the article but I found the story compelling and the &#8216;facts&#8217; eye-opening.</p>
<p>I then read your colleague&#8217;s column from November about <a>John Byrne&#8217;s netiquette</a>.  While your article has more journalistic integrity, I found her story to be equally compelling.  The Byrne piece could be the crown jewel in a future article about the rampant fanaticism &#038; hero worship in this industry.</p>
<p>Point is there&#8217;s a time and place for 4,200 word feasts.  We don&#8217;t need it every week.  But I think the comic audience <i>craves</i> journalism.  The comic book fan is a reader, a critic, a collector, an artist or an art appreciator.  All of those things, to me, describe a person who has the capacity for analysis and who actively analyizes  the world and his surroundings (when he&#8217;s not daydreaming about how hot Mary Jane is, of course).</p>
<p>Keep writing articles like the Speakeasy one.  Besides you liked it.  If you didn&#8217;t have fun writing it you wouldn&#8217;t have done it.  You would have reviewed X-Factor #1 (which was refreshing).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://loudpoet.com/2005/12/16/comment-who-cares-about-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-822</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loudpoet.com/archives/973#comment-822</guid>
		<description>I had a reign of terror once. Okay, it was more like a rain of terror. Alright, alright, it rained on my terrier. Same difference really.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And I think you could do the Mary Jane thing in a really serious, journalistic way. Though you&#039;d probably never, ever get a nod from Ellis again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a reign of terror once. Okay, it was more like a rain of terror. Alright, alright, it rained on my terrier. Same difference really.</p>
<p>And I think you could do the Mary Jane thing in a really serious, journalistic way. Though you&#8217;d probably never, ever get a nod from Ellis again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

