http://loudpoet.com/2006/06/21/crystal-ball-september-2006-solicitations-part-i/ On Publishing, Poetry, Politics and Pop Culture Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:29:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 http://loudpoet.com/2006/06/21/crystal-ball-september-2006-solicitations-part-i/#comment-1265 Mark Fossen Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:55:00 +0000 http://loudpoet.com/archives/1146#comment-1265 Thanks for the good eye on the <i>Emissary</i> creative change ... since that means it's one more title off the pull list. I was in for Rand and Ferreyra, but doubt it's worth continuing when I know that team gets broken up after the first arc. Thanks for the good eye on the Emissary creative change … since that means it’s one more title off the pull list. I was in for Rand and Ferreyra, but doubt it’s worth continuing when I know that team gets broken up after the first arc.

]]> http://loudpoet.com/2006/06/21/crystal-ball-september-2006-solicitations-part-i/#comment-1264 Emperor Nerd Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:42:00 +0000 http://loudpoet.com/archives/1146#comment-1264 Fables is great, but I don't think it would work well as a movie. As you said Shrek is already out there, and there was another CGI this year about similar material. The real difference is tone. Willingham uses more of the real, non-Disneyfied stories that are almost always bloody and violent and occasionally sexual. Very few studios would touch something likr that. Fables is great, but I don’t think it would work well as a movie. As you said Shrek is already out there, and there was another CGI this year about similar material. The real difference is tone. Willingham uses more of the real, non-Disneyfied stories that are almost always bloody and violent and occasionally sexual. Very few studios would touch something likr that.

]]>