<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Your Book Will Never Be in Borders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loudpoet.com/2008/10/24/why-your-book-will-never-be-in-borders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loudpoet.com/2008/10/24/why-your-book-will-never-be-in-borders/</link>
	<description>loudpoet.com: Blogging it like it is since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 20:02:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mondi</title>
		<link>http://loudpoet.com/2008/10/24/why-your-book-will-never-be-in-borders/comment-page-1/#comment-2910</link>
		<dc:creator>Mondi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loudpoet.com/?p=1495#comment-2910</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;m lame.  But thanks for replying :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#39;m lame.  But thanks for replying <img src='http://loudpoet.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy LeCharles Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://loudpoet.com/2008/10/24/why-your-book-will-never-be-in-borders/comment-page-1/#comment-2909</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy LeCharles Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loudpoet.com/?p=1495#comment-2909</guid>
		<description>Wow, you dug all the way back to 2008? Impressive! And no apologies necessary; thanks for the great comments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for publishers, they want authors with a following to sell books to, but as Chris Anderson and Hyperion learned with FREE, content and context require a delicate balance when it comes to online exposure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you dug all the way back to 2008? Impressive! And no apologies necessary; thanks for the great comments.</p>
<p>As for publishers, they want authors with a following to sell books to, but as Chris Anderson and Hyperion learned with FREE, content and context require a delicate balance when it comes to online exposure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mondi</title>
		<link>http://loudpoet.com/2008/10/24/why-your-book-will-never-be-in-borders/comment-page-1/#comment-2898</link>
		<dc:creator>Mondi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loudpoet.com/?p=1495#comment-2898</guid>
		<description>&quot;The electronic testing of a book is something an individual author can do just as easily, if not more so, than a publisher these days...&quot; - I agree with this.  Because if you are writing the book, obviously, you have to love it more than anyone else, to some extent, no? And who better to sell a product than someone who truly loves it? At least you&#039;ll be pushing your own work and it will be important to you.  No one else might give a damn, but at least it gives the author some sort of fulfillment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;...and is a smart way to gauge the market for your work before pitching it to a traditional publisher or investing your own money into publishing it yourself.&quot;  This part I&#039;m 50/50 on.  I really agree with the point of, building a following online, getting some interest, seeing if anyone gives a crap.  But then I wonder if that can ever negatively affect your chances of getting published by a traditional publisher down the road? Or would it increase them, because they&#039;d be able to cash  in on a system that&#039;s already in place?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Sorry for attacking your blog with comments.  I&#039;ve never been here before and so far, I&#039;m loving it.  Addicted much?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The electronic testing of a book is something an individual author can do just as easily, if not more so, than a publisher these days&#8230;&#8221; &#8211; I agree with this.  Because if you are writing the book, obviously, you have to love it more than anyone else, to some extent, no? And who better to sell a product than someone who truly loves it? At least you&#39;ll be pushing your own work and it will be important to you.  No one else might give a damn, but at least it gives the author some sort of fulfillment.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;and is a smart way to gauge the market for your work before pitching it to a traditional publisher or investing your own money into publishing it yourself.&#8221;  This part I&#39;m 50/50 on.  I really agree with the point of, building a following online, getting some interest, seeing if anyone gives a crap.  But then I wonder if that can ever negatively affect your chances of getting published by a traditional publisher down the road? Or would it increase them, because they&#39;d be able to cash  in on a system that&#39;s already in place?</p>
<p>(Sorry for attacking your blog with comments.  I&#39;ve never been here before and so far, I&#39;m loving it.  Addicted much?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

