LINK: Speculation Returns

From the Business section of today’s NY Daily News:

Marvel-ous investments
A “Marvel Comics” No. 1 dating back to 1939 just went for $201,250. A “Captain America” from 1941 featuring the stars-and-stripes clad superhero knocking out Hitler and his thugs, roped in $96,686.

While there’s one voice of reason quoted — “I would not suggest putting significant amounts of money in comic books,” said New York-based accountant Alan Straus. He said no more than 5% to 10% of your investment should go into any type of collectibles. — he appears 14 paragraphs into the article, surrounded by fluffy commentary from collectors; an overly rosy picture of the industry’s “soaring sales” since the collapse in the 90s; and, most depressingly, references to Wizard‘s price guide and the statement that, “Popular new titles, costing about $2.99, can double or triple in value in a matter of weeks.”

Is that light at the end of the tunnel, or a train heading straight for us?

2 thoughts on “LINK: Speculation Returns

  1. Crap. Where was this speculation a year ago when I was going around and pitching comics’ first female dominican albino midget character?

    I was going to give her tetanus and everything. You know, really make her “modern” and “risqué”.

  2. I probably wouldn’t be worried until I see something similar in the Wall Street Journal. That said, excepting one small part, the overall tenor of it leans towards collecting comics with a buy and hold strategy rather than the quick flip. If a few thousand of those type of investors want to come in to the market I don’t think it’s a bad thing.

    On the whole, pretty superficial. I laughed out loud when the only example given of comic book “gimmicks” was Superman’s death.

Keep blogs alive! Share your thoughts here.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.