Kerry = Bush

All you fearful voters out there, especially the ones leaning towards Bush because you think Osama Bin Laden favors Kerry…remember, as it relates to foreign policy, specifically w/r/t to the Middle East, there is no significant difference between Bush and Kerry.

If that’s your main concern, then you should just vote for Nader.

Al-Qaeda doesn’t need to attack the US again to influence the elections because they’ve already succeeded in doing that. The fact that it’s as close as it is the day before the election is proof that Americans have been sufficiently terrorized into not thinking clearly. The fact that we’re [realistically] limited to choosing between Bush and Kerry, instead of Bush and Dean, or Bush and Kucinich, or even Nader as a legitimate 3rd option, is proof that the terrorists are winning.

If Bush wins tomorrow by any other means than outright theft, we’ve effectively surrendered, damning ourselves to four more years of fear and loathing. Kerry may be a lateral step in many ways, but Bush is without question two steps further back.

Voting for Bush is like volunteering to be a suicide bomber, only without the instantaneous death. Or the payoff for your family.

Written by Guy LeCharles Gonzalez

Guy LeCharles Gonzalez is the Chief Content Officer for LibraryPass, and former publisher & marketing director for Writer’s Digest. Previously, he was also project lead for the Panorama Project; director, content strategy & audience development for Library Journal & School Library Journal; and founding director of programming & business development for the original Digital Book World.

2 comments