Last night at the Slam
It’s been a while since I judged a slam (publicly, at least!), especially at 13 where I know several of the regulars personally, so I was surprised when Lynne asked me to judge last night’s open slam. I was happy to do it as a critical listening exercise, though, because I think my ears have become much less sharp ever since I launched Spindle, and my focus has shifted to the page.
Way back in the day, I used to believe in never giving anyone less than 7 points for their work, respecting the effort it takes to simply get on stage and perform in front of an audience, but that floor dropped to 5 points last night for a terrible rhyming poem in the first round. Overall, it was a solid slam with no real standout performances and my scores were almost always the lowest or second lowest of the night with one surprising exception.
I wrote notes on each of my scores and here’s some of my favorites:
Score: 7.5; Good lines looking for an original poem.
Score: 8.0; Too affected; poetry voice. Image overload; all icing, no cake.
Score: 8.0; Slow down! Let people digest the words. Some good lines not allowed to breathe. Didactic tone throughout; where’s the personal connection?
Score: 8.0; Too many images; good ones, but lacking any grounding.
Score: 6.5; Loud and fast, again! (Guess it worked in the first round, though.) Self-referential braggadocio is boring without any introspection or insight. Oooo…introspection shows up too late, too loud, too fast. PS: The other 4 judges obviously aren’t writers.
Score: 7.5; Please stop with the affected preacher/poet voice. Fuck! PS: Truth can, and should, be edited sometimes.
Score: 7.0; Dear poets: Metaphors are to poetry as exposition is to fiction. On their own, it is tired and not nearly enough. PS: Love poems are hard.
Score: 9.2; An old poem that hasn’t gotten “old” yet. For me. “Men disguised as getaway cars.” Nice. PS: How did I end up giving the 2nd highest score?!?! WTF?
Score: 8.5; Surface personal doesn’t dig nearly as deep as [previous poem]. Not a bad poem, but not a third round, nail it to the wall poem, either.
Related
Discover more from As in guillotine...
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Written by Guy LeCharles Gonzalez
Guy LeCharles Gonzalez is the Chief Content Officer for LibraryPass, and former publisher & marketing director for Writer’s Digest. Previously, he was also project lead for the Panorama Project; director, content strategy & audience development for Library Journal & School Library Journal; and founding director of programming & business development for the original Digital Book World.
2 comments
Keep blogs alive! Drop a comment.Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
The flirtation is cute, but the question for me: Are you going for the team?
I have ultimately opted for the grad school excuse, but I’ve always been a sucker for nostalgia…
There was a brief thought that I might slam last night, but I wasn’t really feeling it by the time I got there and hadn’t really prepped for it anyway. I’ve been more focused on editing older work that got read a couple of times and shelved back in the day, largely with the intent to submit it for publication, so I kind of doubt I’ll put forth any real effort to make the team. That said, I might jump into the next one for the hell of it, to see if the adrenaline rush changes my mind.